UPDATED:
Monday 4 October, 2010 14:55
PINHOLE
PHOTOGRAPHY TIL
- Author:
Charles Hart, AZPS
Keen on Photography? Why not consider joining our Society. Full
details available using links in left column. You would be made
most welcome. This special TIL (Technical Information Leaflet)
by our long term member Charles, is only made available publicly
on this website because Charles lectures on this topic and it
thus provides a means for those attending to access a ready-made
illustrated in-depth artricle. Membership brings a number of benefits,
including access to all the TILs, Newsletters, Booklets, Annual
Meets, Free Advice Service (Photographic and Computing) for a
low annual subscription.
CLICK
HERE for access to a printable form of this TIL - with all
details for easy reference as Working Notes - BUT not with illustrations
PART
1. ABOUT PINHOLE IMAGES
Most people
probably think of them as being soft and fuzzy. Well, this is
often the case, but not necessarily so. Apart from their artistic
use in photography, pinholes have scientific applications in situations
where lenses cannot be used. For these, pinholes have to produce
reasonably sharp images. To do so, they must satisfy two important
criteria. The first is quality of construction. The ideal is a
perfectly circular hole in a thin sheet of metal whose thickness
tapers down to virtually nothing at the perimeter of the hole,
and is uniform all the way round. Home-made pinholes are unlikely
to come close to this and so tend to produce soft images.
Manufactured
pinholes are usually much closer to the ideal and, subject to
the second criterion, produce much crisper images. The second
criterion is the relationship of the pinhole diameter to the focal
length. Pinholes do not actually focus light, so, strictly speaking,
it is incorrect to refer to their focal lengths. However, the
correct term - distance of the pinhole from the image plane -
is rather a mouthful, so focal length is more often used. There
is broad agreement that, for any focal length, there is an optimum
diameter which will give the sharpest images. However, different
authorities give different values, although the variations are
not huge. What is not in doubt is that a diameter well away from
optimum gives a much softer image.
Of course,
the quality of the pinhole and its optimum placing from the image
plane only matter if you want your pinhole images to be as sharp
as possible. If you attend to these points and enlarge no more
than x2 or x3, your pinhole images may be almost as sharp as lens
images. But if you want prints that sharp, why use a pinhole anyway?
The answer is that it is entirely up to you. Pinhole photography
is all about experiment, throwing away the rulebook and doing
whatever interests you. Whether your images are sharp or soft,
they will have massive depth of field, from a few inches in front
of the camera to infinity. This is not characteristic of pinholes
as such, but of their very small apertures.
For example,
a 25mm lens used at f16 on a Leica screw camera gives depth of
field from about ¾ metre to infinity. The 24mm f120 pinhole
for this camera could hardly do much better. What is a characteristic
of pinholes is correct geometry. A 6mm glass lens on 35mm film
would be fish-eye. The equivalent 25mm pinhole on a 5x4 camera
renders straight lines at subject edges absolutely straight in
the image.
The corners
of pinhole images are often very dark. This happens because the
cone of light diverges from the back of a pinhole with an angle
of over 160 degrees. So the image plane can be put much closer
to the pinhole than would be possible with a lens, while still
covering the format. For example, a 5 x 4 inch sheet could be
as close as 14 to 15 mm. However, although the circle of light
covers the format, at such close distances the pinhole to corner
light path is much longer than the pinhole to centre path. So
there is dramatic light fall-off at shorter focal lengths. For
the 25mm on 5 x 4 it is about 4 stops centre to corner. As with
glass lenses, the fall-off is less at longer focal lengths. You
can either accept this darkening as a feature of wide-angle pinholes,
or try to reduce it - entirely a matter of taste.
PART
2. CAMERA CHOICE
There are
three options. 1) Put a pinhole on an existing camera in place
of the lens. 2) Buy a factory-made pinhole camera. 3) Make your
own camera.
With the
first, removing the lens from a fixed-lens camera can be difficult.
Interchangeable-lens cameras are easier, and being able to go
from pinhole to lens at will is an advantage with roll films (35mm,
120 and 220) - you may not want to use a whole roll for pinhole
work. To choose, it's best to start by deciding whether you want
to use roll film, sheets (film or paper) or a digital sensor.
Unless your DIY skills are up to making a winding mechanism and
frame counter, the roll film options are an existing lens camera
or a factory-made pinhole camera. For digital, using an existing
camera is the only realistic way, unless you are able to afford
a digital medium or larger format back, of course.. Sheet materials
can be used with any of the camera types and are the easy way
for DIY.
As already
mentioned, existing cameras allow changing between pinhole and
glass. They also allow reasonably accurate framing of the subject.
Finally, if they have focal plane shutters, they provide timed
speeds, useful if you use high ISO speeds or some of the pinhole
variations mentioned in Part 3. Purpose-made cameras offer different
benefits. Apart from very low cost, home-made cameras allow any
size and shape of image plane you want. Both they and factory-made
cameras can be very small and light compared with existing cameras
of the same format. However, the greatest advantage is the possibility
of very wide angles. On existing cameras, the shortest possible
focal length is the flange to image-plane distance in a fixed-body
camera, or the minimum compression in a bellows camera. Recessed
lens boards won't do, because the acceptance angle of over 160
degrees means that pinholes would see their fronts. The 25mm for
5x4 previously mentioned is an example - the limited bellows compression
on a normal 5x4 wouldn't allow anywhere near as short a focal
length to be used.
PART
3. PRACTICALITIES.
a)
PINHOLES
For buying,
there are supplier contacts in the Appendix.
For DIY you can buy blanks from the same sources, or just use
thin scrap metal. The bottoms of foil pie dishes work well. Avoid
aluminium cooking foil - it tears too easily.
Decide
what diameter and focal length you want (see Appendix).
Place the metal on a hard surface, hold a pin of the required
diameter so that it is vertical and its point firmly touches the
metal, and spin the metal around the pin until you have made a
hole all the way through. Turn the metal over and carefully smooth
off any burr from the reverse side. If you have used scrap, cut
out a piece about 1 cm in diameter around the hole to allow for
mounting.
To mount
the pinhole,make a hole a few mm diameter in a body cap or lensboard
and stick the pinhole behind it. Lensboards can be made from mountboard
or other stiff card. For body caps, preferably use proper screw
or bayonet caps. The white plastic ones that come with new cameras
have to be painted to make them opaque and they easily fall off.
For a home-made
camera, either stick the pinhole over a small hole on the front
of the camera, or design it to accept a lensboard, so that you
can easily change pinholes. Use the table in the appendix to find
the aperture of the pinhole from its diameter and its focal length.
It is a good idea to bracket exposures for your first few subjects
and use results to confirm or amend the aperture. If you buy a
pinhole, the maker will tell you its diameter and the f-number
for its intended focal length.
b)
MAKING CAMERAS
You can
either build from scratch, or use an existing container. If you
want to be able to shoot more than one sheet per outing, you will
need to use a changing bag, or design the camera to accept film
holders. It is usual to paint the inside matt black, but I painted
one white, and it worked well. A shutter of some kind is essential.
Black sticky tape is simple, but hard to open without jerking
the camera. A hinged or sliding shutter is better.
A tripod
socket is useful, but not absolutely necessary. Hand-holding is
possible if the shutter action is reasonably smooth, because the
pinhole blur will mask the hand-holding blur. Instead of a single
pinhole, you could use two or three pinholes, multiple pinholes
in various patterns, slits and crosses. I haven't tried any of
these (yet) because I'm too interested in the images produced
by a related device, the zone plate. Essentially, this is very
small circular piece of film, with alternate black and clear concentric
rings. Unlike pinholes they do focus, but this isn't evident because
they throw light from bright areas into the shadows and give a
very diffused image. This, and their larger apertures (f45 is
typical), suit them to hand-holding.
If you
use infra-red film, you will need filters and with simple on-off
shutters, neutral density filters can be useful for extending
the exposure to 1 second or more to enable timing with a watch
or by counting. The best place is inside the camera, held against
the pinhole with Blu-Tak. If the filter has to be in front, because
of the camera type or because you don't want to be stuck with
it for a whole roll, the easiest way is just to hold it, taking
care not to get your fingers in the field of view. This is where
a cable release is handy or, on a homemade camera, a long handle
for the shutter.
c)
VIEWFINDING
The simplest
way is to point and hope. The next step up is to use a viewing
frame. However, with very wide angles, this method isn't at all
accurate. Pinhole work does not have to be about accuracy but
if that's what you want, a suitable focal length accessory finder,
such as you would use with a rangefinder camera, works better
for wide angles. . The most accurate method is to compose with
a lens of the same focal length and then replace it by the pinhole.
d)
METERING
Pinhole
apertures may be outside the range of your meter, as may be the
ISO from 1 to 12, typical of paper and infra-red films. If so,
make a table which enables you to find the exposure at your aperture
and ISO from the time for an aperture and ISO which are in range.
With simple pinholes, exposures are often long enough to lead
to reciprocity failure, so get to know the reciprocity characteristics
of your material. With long exposures in fading light, it is often
necessary to extend the original time, sometimes more than once.
It makes for an interesting life. This is less likely with multi-pinholes
and zone plates, which have larger apertures.
e)PHOTO
PAPER
Remember
that this will give you a paper negative, which you will have
to contact if you want a positive print. With Ilford's latest
paper product - Direct Positive Paper
- you simply expose in camera, process as usual and you have a
positive image. I find it works well.
APPENDIX
1)
Diameters
D and Focal
Lengths F, both in
mm, and Apertures A
. NOTE: Apertures are only for the given focal lengths.
To use the same diameter for a different focal length, divide
the new focal length by the diameter.
D............
F.............. A
0.2.......... 25..........
f 125
0.25........ 50...........f
200
0.30........ 75..........
f 250
0.35...... 100..........
f 286
0.40...... 125..........
f 312
0.45...... 150..........
f 333
0.50...... 200..........
f 400
0.55...... 250..........
f 455
0.60...... 300..........
f 500
2)
BOOK
Pinhole
Photography. Eric Renner. Focal Press.
3)
WEBSITES
a)
Information, books, cameras, pinholes: http://www.pinholeresource.com
b)
DPP paper - info/buy: http://www.ilfordphoto.com
c)
Info: on processes: http://www.alternativephotography.com
d)
CAMERA MAKERS
http://www.pinholesolutions.co.uk
http://www.zeroimage.com
On ebay,
the seller http://stores.ebay.com/good2rely?_rdc=1
- interchangeable pinholes in very well-made metal mounts for
Canon, Leica, Nikon, etc.
e)
MATERIALS
Refer to
TIL 49, but note that Retro Photographic are no longer trading.
Most of what they supplied is available from Silverprint: http://www.silverprint.com
or http://www.ag-photographic.co.uk
4)
ADDITIONAL IMAGES:
Because this TIL contains larger B+W images, I have put some illustrative
colour images in my ZPS pbase
gallery, in the sub-gallery entitled Pinzone:
http://www.pbase.com/zps/pinzone
but please note this is work in progress, so do
remember to return to this gallery regularly to view more images
as they are processed and uploaded
PINHOLE
EXPOSURE GUIDE
PART
1 - BASIC GUIDE
This covers
from about ISO 200 in good light to about ISO 25 in dull light,
based on metered exposures at F16 from 1/250s to 1s.
TO
USE THE TABLE: Meter to find the exposure for f16, then
read down to find the exposure for the aperture of your pinhole.
For example, if the exposure at f16 is 1/8s, at f180 the basic
exposure will be 16s - but a reciprocity correction may be needed.
See Below.
Pinholes
often have intermediate apertures, eg, f138 or f155. If the aperture
is close to one in the table, use the time for that-the time for
f128 will be valid for f138. If it is roughly mid-way, estimate
between adjacent times. Eg: if the time is 1/15s at f16, use 6s
for f155.
RECIPROCITY
FAILURE
If you
use film, you MAY need to compensate for this by giving extra
exposure. The extra has NOT been included in the table because
it depends on both the particular film and the basic exposure.
For example, Adox CHS 25 needs about ½ stop extra at 2
seconds, and at least 2 stops at 2 minutes, whereas Fuji Provia
100F does not need any extra at all before 2 minutes.
NOTE:
The times are in seconds until they are more than 1 minute,
when they are given, eg:, as 1min 4 seconds. They are precise
relative to those for f16, but in practice they can be rounded
off. You would not see any difference between exposures of 32s
and 30s, or between 4min 16 and 4 minutes.

PART
2 - SUPPLEMENTARY GUIDE
a) FOR
METERED TIME AT f16 SHORTER THAN 1/250s
....In the basic table, find the
time for your pinhole aperture which corresponds to 1/250s at
f16. Then DIVIDE it as follows for your
metered time at f16
....FOR
METERED TIME AT f16: 1/500 - 1/1000 - 1/2000 - 1/4000
....DIVIDE
1/250s TIME BY: 2 - 4 - 8 - 16 respectively
For example,
if metered time is 1/1000s and pinhole aperture is f128. The 1/250s
column in the basic table gives 1/4s for f128. Dividing by 4 gives
1/16s as the actual exposure. On a timed shutter, 1/15s would
easily be near enough. With a simple on/off shutter you couldn't
have so short a time - see d) below - Camera
Design
b)
FOR METERED TIME AT f16 LONGER THAN 1s
In the
basic table, find the time for your pinhole or zone plate aperture
which corresponds to 1s at f16. Then MULTIPLY
it by your metered time at f16
For example, if metered time is 4s and zone plate aperture is
f45. The 1s column in the table gives 8s for f45, so the basic
exposure would be 32s. However, remember that for times over 1s,
you may need to correct for reciprocity failure.
c)
ISO FOR SLOW MATERIALS
If the
ISO is too low for your meter, set ISO 100, find the exposure
for f16 and then for your actual aperture from the basic guide.
Then MULTIPLY that as below
REQUIRED
ISO: 25 - 20 - 16 - 12 - 10 - 8 - 6 - 5 - 4 - 3 - 2 -
1 - ½
MULTIPLY
ISO 100 TIME BY: 4 - 5 - 6 - 8 - 10 - 12 - 16 - 20 - 25
- 32 - 50 - 100 - 200
Finally,
make a reciprocity failure correction, if needed. For example,
pinhole aperture is f138, film is ISO 12 and needs ½ stop
extra for reciprocity failure between 2s and 30s.
First,
set ISO 100 on your meter and find the time for f16. Suppose
it is 1/30s. Next, read down from 1/30s in the basic table. This
gives 2s for f128, which is close enough to the actual f138. Then,
for ISO 12, MULTPLY by 8, to get
16s.
Finally,
add the 1/2 stop for reciprocity failure, to get the required
exposure of 24s
d)
USING THE GUIDE FOR CAMERA DESIGN/MATERIAL CHOICE.
For cameras
with simple on/off shutters, whether home-made or bought, the
essential consideration is to have an exposure of at least 1s,
to allow timing with a watch or by counting. The example below
shows how to achieve this, using the tables and the guide REQUIRED
ISO = 1/EXPOSURE IN GOOD SUNLIGHT AT f16
Example:
For a pinhole aperture f128. The basic table shows that, for 1s
at f128, the corresponding f16 time is 1/60s. So the fastest material
practicable for use in good light would be ISO 60 = effectively,
on the usual scale, ISO 64.
To
design a camera, start with the focal length you want and
a pinhole diameter (which may or may not be optimum-your choice).
Work out: Aperture = Focal Length/Diameter. Now follow the above
example to find the highest ISO which allows a minimum exposure
in good sunlight of 1s. If you wanted to use something faster
than this, you'll need to think again about the focal length and
diameter.
PINHOLE
and ZONE PLATE ILLUSTRATIONS
All images
are scans from black-and-white negatives and are designed for
viewing on-screen with their longest dimensions at about 8 inches.
Where necessary,
contrast and brightness have been adjusted to match the dark-room
work prints as well as possible. With one exception, the images
have been cropped only very slightly at their edges, to about
the extent that they would be masked by the neg carrier in an
enlarger.
The Set
3 images have been rotated slightly to make the left-hand
edge of the tower vertical.They have not been edited in any other
way, because their purpose is to show as nearly as possible straight
results from pinholes and zone plates.
Except
where stated otherwise for particular images, they have been made
with pinholes or zone plates of optimum diameters for their focal
lengths and with tripod mounted cameras.
All
the pinholes and zone plates were factory-made.
>>>
The following information on the sets is given here for ease of
reference. The individual information for each set is also repeated,
as appropriate, before each set of images below.
SET1
These are all from 6cm square negs, using a 25mm pinhole, which
is roughly equivalent to 15mm focal length on 35mm film or full-frame
sensor.
Distant
Hills
shows typical pinhole softness. The wide angle of view exaggerates
the distances. The far side of the field is actually only 300yards
or so from the camera position. The power lines there would be
recorded by a lens, but in this image they have disappeared in
the pinhole blur --no need at all for Photoshop! Conversely, while
Tree in Snow is also soft, the pinhole
definition is sufficient to record the nearby fence wires.
Bridge
and St Peter's again are soft, but
well enough defined for viewers to see easily that the bridge
is built of bricks and the church of stone.
These pictures
were made with the camera on a tripod, but for Lake
it was hand-held for a 4 seconds exposure.
SET
2 Olive
Grove. These are all from 35mm negs, using 24mm focal length
pinholes and zone plates.
OG1
and OG2 compare pinhole (1) with
zone plate (2).
OG1
and
OG3 compare optimum pinhole (1) with
about twice optimum diameter (3)
0G2
and OG4 perform the same service
for zone plates - 2 is the optimum.
SET3
Holy Cross. These are also from 35mm
negs, using the same optimum diameter 24mm pinhole and zone plate
as for OG1 and OG2 respectively.
HC1,
HC2 and HC3
compare a lens (1), zone plate (2) and pinhole (3), from the same
viewpoint. The set provides another tripod-mounted versus hand-held
comparison.
HC4
(zone plate)and HC5 (pinhole) are
handheld. When comparing, bear in mind that the closer viewpoint
puts 4 and 5 at some disadvantage.
SET4
Just as with lens images, the enlarging magnification is an important
factor in the definition available from pinhole and zone plate
negatives. This should be apparent by comparing Set 1 from 6x6
negs with sets 2 and 3 from 35mm.
If you
are viewing at the recommended 8 inches longest side, the enlargements
are roughly 3 1/2 x and 5 1/2 x respectively. Set 4 is from 5
x 4 negs and the enlargement is roughly 1.6x.
Tree,
Aberglaslyn
was made with a 50mm pinhole, equivalent to about 12mm on 35mm
film or full-frame sensor. For the other two images I used a 25mm
pinhole, equivalent to about 6mm.
At this
extreme wide angle, there is a huge light fall-off from centre
to edge, which is very evident in St. Matthew's.
(This image also shows evidence, although much less obviously,
that the photographer was not asleep on the job!)
The camera
was about 6 feet above ground level and just far enough from the
base of the tower (30-35 feet) to include the top of the tower
while keeping the sides vertical. From this position, the wide
angle of view inevitably led to the inclusion of the foreground,
almost up to the front foot of the tripod. The darkroom version
I showed at the Meet had most of the foreground cropped out.
Towel
Rail
illustrates the ability of pinholes to produce correct geometry,
even at extreme wide angles. This image has been cropped left
and right, to bring the towel rail's sides close to the frame
edges and so to make it easier to see that they are straight.
It has not been cropped at its top or bottom. The pinhole was
about 18 inches from the nearest point on the rail.
SET5
- back to 35mm negs with a 24mm pinhole Traffic
1 and a 24mm zone plate Traffic 2.
If there is any wind, clouds and foliage in pinhole images are
likely to be blurred by movement during the exposure. However,
the movement blur is often masked by the pinhole softness, which
is the case in most of the images in the other sets. Set
5 shows what happens when movement blur definitely outweighs
pinhole blur. What you cannot see in the images is the roundabout
just behind the camera position, and the other roundabout at the
end of the street - not far away, because, once again, the wide
angle of view exaggerates the distance.
With these
obstructions, contrary to appearances, a traffic cop with a radar
gun would do no business whatsoever.
SET
6 This
set comprises Tree, Aberglaslyn (from
Set 4, repeated for clarity in comparison) and Pines,
which is from a 6x6 neg on infra-red film.
A comparison
of these gives another example of the effect of enlarging magnification.
I have framed prints of both images.
Pines is
about 10 inches square, and looks sharp at a distance of 3 to
4 feet.
Tree is
about 12 x 10 inches, and looks sharp at half that distance.
I have
included the infrared example because I particularly like the
combination of i/r film with a pinhole or zone plate. The exposure
for the f138 pinhole was 60s, in fairly good sunlight for the
time, late afternoon in mid-October. Infra-red film speeds depend
on the film, the filter used and on the i/r content of the light.
With deep
red or opaque filters, they range from ISO 1 to 12, which gives
exposures long enough to time with a watch or by counting - useful
with typical zone plate apertures of about f45 on cameras with
simple on-off shutters.
NOTE
ON CAMERAS
The 35mm
negs were made using a screwthread Leica fitted with a mount which
takes interchangeable pinholes and zone plates. (See http://stores.ebay.com/good2rely?_rdc=1
in the resource list).
I found
the views using the 25mm finder which came with the lens used
for image 1 in Set 3.
The 24mm
focal length would not be possible on a 35mm SLR, because the
deeper body means that the pinhole has to be much further from
the image plane.
The larger
negs were made with Zero 2000 and Zero 54 cameras (Zero Image
in the resource list).
The 54
is adjustable to focal lengths of 25, 50 and 75mm, with an optimum
diameter pinhole and zone plate for each focal length.
It would
not be possible to make 35mm or medium format equivalents (about
6, 12 and 18mm on 35mm film) at reasonable cost, because the bodies
have to be deep enough to hold the cassettes or spools, which
are both about 25mm in diameter.
The only
way would be to have a narrow central section for the film gate
and pinhole or zone plate, with deeper ends to accommodate the
cassettes or spools. This would be far more expensive to make
than a simple box shape, and probably much less robust
THE
IMAGES
SET1
- These
are all from 6cm square negs, using a 25mm pinhole, which is roughly
equivalent to 15mm focal length on 35mm film or full-frame sensor.
Distant
Hills
shows typical pinhole softness. The wide angle of view exaggerates
the distances. The far side of the field is actually only 300yards
or so from the camera position. The power lines there would be
recorded by a lens, but in this image they have disappeared in
the pinhole blur --no need at all for Photoshop! Conversely, while
Tree in Snow is also soft, the pinhole
definition is sufficient to record the nearby fence wires.
Bridge
and St Peter's again are soft, but
well enough defined for viewers to see easily that the bridge
is built of bricks and the church of stone.
These pictures
were made with the camera on a tripod, but for Lake
it was hand-held for a 4 seconds exposure.
DISTANT
HILLS - Pinhole, 6x6 camera on tripod

TREE
IN SNOW
- Pinhole, 6x6 camera on tripod

BRIDGE
- Pinhole, 6x6 camera on tripod

ST.
PETER's
- Pinhole, 6x6 camera on tripod

LAKE
- Pinhole, 6x6 camera hand-held - 4 secs

SET
2 - Olive
Grove. These are all from 35mm negs, using 24mm focal length
pinholes and zone plates.
OG1
and OG2 compare pinhole (1) with
zone plate (2).
OG1
and
OG3 compare optimum pinhole (1) with
about twice optimum diameter (3)
0G2
and OG4 perform the same service
for zone plates - 2 is the optimum.
OLIVE
GROVE 1 - 35mm - optimum pinhole

OLIVE
GROVE 2 - 35mm - optimum Zone Plate

OLIVE
GROVE 3 - 35mm - 2X optimum pinhole diameter

OLIVE
GROVE 4 - 35mm - 2X optimum Zone Plate

SET3
- Holy
Cross. These are also from 35mm negs, using the same optimum
diameter 24mm pinhole and zone plate as for OG1 and OG2 respectively.
HC1,
HC2 and HC3
compare a lens (1), zone plate (2) and pinhole (3), from the same
viewpoint. The set provides another tripod-mounted versus hand-held
comparison.
HC4
(zone plate)and HC5 (pinhole) are
handheld. When comparing, bear in mind that the closer viewpoint
puts 4 and 5 at some disadvantage.
HOLY
CROSS 1 - 35mm - Lens Image

HOLY
CROSS 2 - 35mm - optimum Zone Plate - Tripod-mounted

HOLY
CROSS - 35mm - optimum Pinhole - Tripod-mounted

HOLY
CROSS 4 -. 35mm - optimum Zone Plate - Hand-held

HOLY
CROSS 5 - 35mm - optimum Pinhole - Hand-held

SET4
- Just
as with lens images, the enlarging magnification is an important
factor in the definition available from pinhole and zone plate
negatives. This should be apparent by comparing Set 1 from 6x6
negs with sets 2 and 3 from 35mm.
If you
are viewing at the recommended 8 inches longest side, the enlargements
are roughly 3 1/2 x and 5 1/2 x respectively. Set 4 is from 5
x 4 negs and the enlargement is roughly 1.6x.
Tree,
Aberglaslyn
was made with a 50mm pinhole, equivalent to about 12mm on 35mm
film or full-frame sensor. For the other two images I used a 25mm
pinhole, equivalent to about 6mm.
At this
extreme wide angle, there is a huge light fall-off from centre
to edge, which is very evident in St. Matthew's.
(This image also shows evidence, although much less obviously,
that the photographer was not asleep on the job!)
The camera
was about 6 feet above ground level and just far enough from the
base of the tower (30-35 feet) to include the top of the tower
while keeping the sides vertical. From this position, the wide
angle of view inevitably led to the inclusion of the foreground,
almost up to the front foot of the tripod. The darkroom version
I showed at the Meet had most of the foreground cropped out.
Towel
Rail
illustrates the ability of pinholes to produce correct geometry,
even at extreme wide angles. This image has been cropped left
and right, to bring the towel rail's sides close to the frame
edges and so to make it easier to see that they are straight.
It has not been cropped at its top or bottom. The pinhole was
about 18 inches from the nearest point on the rail.
TREE,
ABERGLASLYN - 5x4 - Pinhole

ST:
MATTHEW's - 5x4 - Pinhole

TOWEL
RAIL - 5x4 - Pinhole

SET5
- Back
to 35mm negs with a 24mm pinhole Traffic
1 and a 24mm zone plate Traffic 2.
If there is any wind, clouds and foliage in pinhole images are
likely to be blurred by movement during the exposure. However,
the movement blur is often masked by the pinhole softness, which
is the case in most of the images in the other sets. Set 5 shows
what happens when movement blur definitely outweighs pinhole blur.
What you cannot see in the images is the roundabout just behind
the camera position, and the other roundabout at the end of the
street - not far away, because, once again, the wide angle of
view exaggerates the distance.
With these
obstructions, contrary to appearances, a traffic cop with a radar
gun would do no business whatsoever.
TRAFFIC
1 - 35mm Pinhole

TRAFFIC
2 - 35mm - Zone Plate

SET
6 -
This set comprises Tree, Aberglaslyn
(from Set 4, repeated for clarity in comparison) and Pines,
which is from a 6x6 neg on infra-red film.
A comparison
of these gives another example of the effect of enlarging magnification.
I have framed prints of both images.
Pines is
about 10 inches square, and looks sharp at a distance of 3 to
4 feet.
Tree is
about 12 x 10 inches, and looks sharp at half that distance.
I have
included the infrared example because I particularly like the
combination of Infra-Red film with a pinhole or zone plate. The
exposure for the f138 pinhole was 60s, in fairly good sunlight
for the time, late afternoon in mid-October. Infra-red film speeds
depend on the film, the filter used and on the i/r content of
the light.
With deep
red or opaque filters, they range from ISO 1 to 12, which gives
exposures long enough to time with a watch or by counting - useful
with typical zone plate apertures of about f45 on cameras with
simple on-off shutters.
TREE,
ABERGLASLYN - 5x4 - Pinhole (Repeated from SET 4)

PINES
- 6x6 - Pinhole - Infra Red film
