There
is
a
lot
of
information
about
types
and
makes
of
paper
for
the
production
of
photographic
quality
prints
via
inkjet
printers,
specifically
models
in
the
Epson
range.
Additionally,
there
is
also
a
great
deal
of
discussion,
claims,
research
and
the
like
on
the
various
comparative
values
and
light
fastness,
or
otherwise,
of
different
inks
-
often
referred
to
as
ink
sets.
Test
results
have
been
quoted
only
later
to
be
modified,
sometimes
drastically
in
adverse
manner,
so
it
is
a
bit
of
a
minefield
for
anyone
seeking
quality
information
on
what
base
media
and
inks
to
employ,
if
seeking
long
lasting
images
in
digital
form.
I
think,
from
my
own
research,
that
the
base
media
is
by
far
the
most
important
part
of
the
equation.
From
what
test
results
have
been
reasonably
settled,
even
claimed
archival
inks
would
appear
to
be
severely
compromised
if
the
media
used
is
one
of
the
claimed
"photographic"
papers.
Examples
are
"papers"
by
Epson
(Epson
Photo
Paper),
Olmec,
Ilford,
Kodak
and
so
on.
There
are
many
varieties
of
make
and
surface
finishes
and
a
lot
of
information
on
how
they
compared
for
longevity.
Not
just
as
a
material
but
how
they
react
to
the
inks
used
too.
Bronzing
seems
to
affect
many
photo-gloss
materials!
(Where
a
sort-of
surface
bronze
appearance
appears
on
shadow
values).
However,
see
later
comments
about
Jessops
Satin
photo
paper,
which
we
can
recommend.
In
basic
terms,
to
achieve
the
longest
image
life,
it
really
is
necessary
to
use
an
acid-free
base
paper.
There
are
many
watercolour
papers
(and
acid-free
cartridge
papers
too)
available,
in
various
weights,
that
can
satisfy
these
requirements.
I
personally
do
not
think
there
is
a
lot
between
the
different
makes
in
real
terms,
so
it
is
probably
better
to
get
what
is
available
from
a
local
art
shop.
It
is
often
cheaper,
in
the
long
run,
to
enquire
about
any
special
purchase
offers.
As
one
example,
the
Winsor
&
Newton
"Cotman"
watercolour
papers,
easily
available
in
the
UK,
can
be
obtained
in
packs
of
25
sheets
at
around
half
the
normal
one-sheet
rate
in
an
Artists
Supply
shop.
As
a
guide,
in
the
UK,
one
sheet
of
most
art
watercolour
papers
is
around
the
£3.00
mark,
meaning
a
cost
of
£1.50
or
so
for
an
A3+
size
piece
to
print
on,
or
around
75p
for
a
quarter
sheet
for
images
around
11"x14",
though
corner
and
other
watermarks
and
embossings
have
to
be
allowed
for,
depending
on
each
make.
Cartridge
papers
can
also
work
well,
are
much
cheaper,
can
be
in
quite
heavy
weights
in
variety
of
finishes
and
at
considerable
savings
over
watercolour
paper
prices.
These
are
also
acid
free!
At
the
present
time
25
sheets
of
the
Cotman
Cold
Pressed
(NOT)
watercolour
paper,
which
is
a
high
quality
thick
material,
140
lbs
weight,
with
a
rough
textured
surface
is
available
in
this
pack
size
for
an
individual
sheet
price
of
around
£2.00
-
a
very
good
saving
indeed.
The
hot
pressed
papers
are
often
of
lighter
weight,
e.g.:
90
lbs,
and
offer
a
smooth
surface
but
with
a
less
rigid
and
thinner
base.
An
excellent
heavyweight
and
inexpensive
material
is
the
W&N
Bristol
Board
(acid
and
wood
free)
available
in
various
A-sized
pads.
Personal
preferences
will
come
into
play
as
regards
requirements
and
aesthetic
appreciation
of
each
individual
as
to
what
they
seek
for
their
print
output.
The
interesting
thing
to
me
is
that
years
ago,
I
made
some
Platinum
prints
and
used
watercolour
paper
for
the
base
to
coat
with
the
emulsion.
Things
have
come
round
almost
a
full
circle!
I
must
admit
that
my
printing
now
closely
resembles
prints
made
via
the
Platinum
process,
so
I
am
well
pleased
with
the
progress
I
have
made
with
my
personal
digital
printing
techniques
and
am
now
prepared
to
place
such
images
alongside
my
conventionally
produced
ones.
An
interesting
thought
is
that
when
I
was
young
(!)
Bromoil
was
considered
"not
photography"
but
"playing
around
with
muck
oils".
It
amuses
me
to
hear
die-hard
photographers
deriding
digital
work
whilst
praising
Bromoil
as
a
"traditional
photographic
technique".
The
end
result,
in
both
cases,
is
an
image
formed
with
ink!
They
are
obviously
much
younger
than
me
and
lacking
in
real
knowledge
or
experience
of
what
photography
is
all
about.
I
believe
in
the
statement
that
"all
art
is
the
same"
in
being
a
personal
expression
through
a
chosen
media,
whether
music,
painting,
photography,
sculpting,
etc.
etc.
etc.
In
any
event,
what
is
"Art"
to
one
is
"Art
with
a
capital
F"
to
another!
(A
superb
original
quote
by:
Ken
Nelson,
President
of
the
Zone
8
Photographic
Society)
So,
what
of
the
ink
-
or
ink
sets
-
to
use?
There
are
many
differing
thoughts
about
this
important
matter.
On
our
web
site
is
a
page
with
Links
to
other
useful
sites.
For
inkjet
information,
I
would
suggest
those
with
Internet
access
should
subscribe
to
the
online
newsletter
by
Royce
Bair
-
this
link
also
being
on
our
Links
page.
Here
you
will
get
all
the
latest
information
on
ink
and
paper
research
and
test
results
plus
useful
articles.
Basically,
inks
comprise
those
based
on
Dyes
and
Pigments.
The
latest
Epson
printers,
such
as
the
A3+
Epson
1270/1280/1290
use
special
stable
dye
inks
from
Epson,
in
special
non-refillable
cartridges
with
an
incorporated
microchip.
Epson
are
claiming
10+
years
life
for
images
even
on
their
plasticised
Photo
Paper
and
longer
for
their
new
range
of
base
materials.
However,
several
adverse
reports
(especially
in
high
ozone
areas)
seems
to
indicate
all
is
not
well!
The
even
later
Epson
2000,
using
pigmented
inks,
claims
life
expectancy
of
around
200
years!
However,
again,
this
seems
to
only
be
if
a
special
Epson
paper
is
used
with
these
inks.
Royce
Bair's
Company
now
offer
pigmented
ink
sets
for
the
previously
dye-ink-only
Epsons,
like
the
1200,
1160
and
1270/80/90
models.
Interestingly,
the
British
manufacturer,
Lyson,
claim
long
life
for
their
dye
based
inks,
provided
these
are
used
on
the
right
base
materials.
Full
information
on
test
results
from
the
link
to
Royce
Bair's
company
site.
In
general,
it
is
claimed
that
dye
inks
give
a
wider
range
of
colours
and
tones
than
the
claimed
more
permanent
pigmented
ones.
I
suppose
you
"pays
your
money
and
takes
your
choice"
according
to
need.
My
own
personal
experience
is
that
using
PrintRite
compatible
black
and
colour
inks
have
shown
absolutely
no
signs
of
any
fading
at
all,
despite
being
displayed
in
the
worst
possible
place
in
terms
of
strong
lighting
and
even
sunlight.
Even
a
watercolour
would
have
shown
some
fading
in
these
conditions.
Obviously,
I
do
not
advocate
using
such
locations
for
long
term
but
it
seems
to
indicated
a
good
life
expectancy
if
sensible
display
locations
are
used.
One
problem
I
have
noticed
with
many
alternative
"archival"
inks
is
the
image
appearance.
Although
using
different
grey
inks
-
in
the
Quadtone
systems,
to
replace
the
colour
cartridge
in
such
printers
as
the
Epson
Photo-Ex
and
3000
for
example
to
get
tonal
gradation
in
B+W
prints
-
whilst
the
general
gradation
is
nice
and
smooth,
the
print
looks
like
a
conventionally
"wet"
processed
print
made
on
a
soft
grade.
Lovely
gradation
BUT
where's
the
BLACK?
During
this
time,
I
have
noticed
some
deterioration
of
test
prints
on
inexpensive
Coated
Inkjet
Paper
as
too
on
Epson
Photo
Paper
-
and
these
were
kept
away
from
light
in
good,
dry
conditions.
So,
my
general
advice
is
sort
the
base
material
first
and
worry
about
the
inks
later.
I
think
fading
problems
are
more
due
the
additional
two
paler
colour
inks
in
the
Epson
Photo
printers,
which
have
five
colours
plus
black.
The
black
ink
on
its
own,
which
is
perfectly
feasible
to
use
for
B+W
work
with
the
850
and
1200/1160
printers
-
also
870
&
1270/80/90
-
would
appear
to
be
far
more
stable
anyway,
so
I
really
do
not
think
it
is
a
very
important
issue
compared
to
the
base
media
employed.
Anyway,
keep
an
eye
on
developments
and
subscribe
to
Royce's
newsletter
to
keep
right
up
to
date
and
watch
our
own
web
site
for
updated
information
and
links.
Colour
compatible
inks?
They
are
much
cheaper.
Are
they
any
good?
It
seems
to
depend
on
whose
you
use.
All
colour
inks
are
suspect
to
some
lesser
or
greater
extent.
My
own
experience
with
the
compatible
colour
ink
(PrintRite)
from
eSunrise
in
the
UK
has
been
very
satisfying.
Apart
from
the
slight
adjustment
to
colour
balance
via
PhotoShop,
mentioned
in
an
article
on
the
web
site
and
in
the
article
on
getting
the
onscreen
and
print
output
to
look
the
same,
have
found
them
extremely
good
and
very
stable,
whereas
several
made
using
the
original
Epson
colour
cartridge
have
faded
-
all
being
on
the
same
coated
inkjet
paper
and
displayed
in
similar
locations
now
for
a
couple
of
years.
B+W
compatible
inks?
Several
ZPS
members
have
used
(on
my
recommendation),
for
some
time,
the
very
inexpensive
PrintRite
inks
(both
Black
and
Colour
Cartridges)
from
eSunrise
and
have
been
very
satisfied.
Member
Ralph
Soar
had
two
prints
accepted
for
the
ZPS
Millennium
Exhibition
made
using
this
black
ink,
so
image
quality
is
fine.
I
use
it
myself
for
all
B+W
prints
and
on
art
materials
(as
distinct
from
plasticised
inkjet
materials,
ensuring
image
stability,
being
wood
and
acid
free
base)
there
has
been
no
fading
on
any
displayed
work.
One
cartridge
is
almost
a
sixth
or
less
of
the
Epson
black
ink
price.
Buy
three
or
more
at
a
time
and
make
even
greater
cost
savings!
One
special
mention
for
Jessops
own
Satin
photo
paper.
In
UK
is
currently
available
(A3
-
packet
of
20
sheets)
for
£14.99.
Prints
(colour
and
B+W
using
PrintRite
inks)
that
have
been
on
display
for
over
three
years
show
no
signs
of
fading,
so
can
be
recommended
for
prints
where
a
more
"conventional
photographic
image
look"
is
desired.
Check
the
PrintRite
website
for
more
details
and
specifications.
http://www.print-rite.com
I
would
caution
any
one
using
other
than
PrintRite
cartridges
as
I
have
had
reports
from
several
members
of
having
to
pa
for
high
servicing
costs
due
some
makes
clogging
their
printer!
One
in
particular
appears
to
be
lethal
for
Epsons!
Any
comments/feedback
would
be
appreciated,
especially
if
you
have
anything
interesting
to
report
in
terms
of
life
expectancy
of
images
via
inkjet
printers